This first image was uploaded by Imageshack. The process was very fast any easy, with just a simple drag and drop with the process of grabbing the link extremely easy to do. The formatting was very large, having to be downsized in order to be used, whether this is a good or bad thing is up to the user. The quality seems to be lessened compared to the other photos, but that may just be my imagination.
This next image was uploaded via Flickr. The process was similar to that of Imageshack, but it was much harder to find the html code. It took me a few minutes, but it was relatively simple. The formatting was large, but not so large as to require downsizing much. The quality of the photo seems to have been heightened by just a bit, as I feel like I can see more detail in this photo, as opposed to the Imageshack one, but that's probably just my imagination.
This last picture was for Photobucket. The dragging and dropping method did not work on my computer, unlike the other services in this gallery. However, when I found the method to upload them, it was very simple and fast to do. Finding the HTML was very simple, just right on the side of the page. It also did an auto-copy, which was nice, but not entirely necessary.
All in all, I'd say the best for hosting pictures, is probably Imageshack, with its relatively easy to find HTML code, good quality of picture and being fast and simple to use. But, all of the processes seem at least relatively simple, so it's all about opinion.
No comments:
Post a Comment